Is It Legal to Pass on Credit Card Fees to Customers? (2026) | IntelliPay
Payment Compliance

Is It Legal to Pass on Credit Card Fees to Customers?

Yes — in most U.S. states, it is. But the rules around how you do it matter just as much as whether you can. Here’s what merchants need to know in 2026.

Updated May 2026 8 minute read
Quick answer:

Yes, it’s legal to pass credit card processing costs to customers in most U.S. states. Businesses generally have four options: surcharging, convenience fees, dual pricing, and service fees. The right option depends on your industry, your payment channels, and the state rules that apply to you.

Credit card processing fees usually run between 1.5% and 3.5% per transaction. For many small businesses, that makes payment processing one of the bigger operating expenses after labor, rent, and inventory. That’s why more merchants are looking closely at whether they can legally pass some or all of those costs along to customers.

The short version is yes, but there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Some approaches are widely available. Others are heavily regulated. And a few are reserved for specific merchant types, like government agencies and higher education institutions.

Your 4 Cost-Recovery Options

Option 1

Credit Card Surcharging

Add a percentage-based fee to eligible credit card transactions to offset processing costs. This offers the highest direct recovery, but it comes with the most restrictions.

Option 2

Convenience Fees

Charge a flat fee for using an alternative payment channel, such as online or phone payments. Legal nationwide, but limited in how and when it can be used.

Option 3

Dual Pricing

Display one price for cash and another for card. It’s legal in all 50 states and often the cleanest fit for merchants who want predictable compliance.

Option 4

Service Fees

Special fee programs available to eligible government agencies and higher education institutions, usually processed separately from the base transaction.

Option 1: Credit Card Surcharging

Credit card surcharging allows a merchant to add a fee to a transaction when the customer chooses to pay with a credit card. It’s the most direct way to recover processing costs, which is why many businesses look at it first. It is also the most tightly regulated option.

If you surcharge, the fee can apply only to credit cards — not debit cards and not prepaid cards, even when those cards are run as credit. Visa caps surcharges at 3%, while Mastercard allows up to 4%, but in every case the fee must stay at or below your actual cost of acceptance.

Card network basics for surcharging

Visa and Mastercard generally require 30 days’ advance notice before you begin surcharging. The surcharge must be disclosed clearly before the transaction is completed, and it must appear as a separate line item on the receipt.

Where surcharging is prohibited or restricted

As of May 2026, surcharging is prohibited or effectively restricted in several jurisdictions. California remains the most notable example because of its total-price disclosure requirements under SB 478.

JurisdictionStatusNotes
CaliforniaRestrictedSB 478 requires the total advertised price to include mandatory fees, making traditional checkout-added surcharges problematic.
ConnecticutProhibitedSurcharging remains banned under state law.
MassachusettsProhibitedSurcharging remains prohibited under state consumer law.
MaineProhibitedSurcharging remains prohibited, with limited exceptions for certain government uses.
Puerto RicoProhibitedTerritory-wide surcharge prohibition remains in place.

Recent surcharging changes merchants should know

Kansas: Kansas legalized surcharging effective January 1, 2025, bringing it in line with most other states.

Minnesota: Minnesota added verbal disclosure requirements for face-to-face transactions effective January 1, 2025, and continues to require mandatory-fee transparency.

Oklahoma: Oklahoma legalized surcharging effective November 1, 2025, but limits the surcharge to 2% or actual processing cost, whichever is lower.

Virginia: Virginia’s enhanced total-price disclosure rules took effect July 1, 2025, requiring mandatory fees and surcharges to be shown clearly in the displayed price.

Illinois update

The Illinois Interchange Fee Prohibition Act is one of the most important recent changes. The law takes effect July 1, 2026, and prohibits interchange fees on the tax and gratuity portions of transactions. If you process payments in Illinois, confirm with your processor how tax and tip data are being separated and handled. This area has seen legal challenges, so it deserves ongoing monitoring.

North Carolina: Proposed legislation would cap surcharges at 2%, but as of May 2026 it remains under consideration.

New York: Proposed legislation would also cap surcharges at 2%, but as of May 2026 it remains under committee review.

Option 2: Convenience Fees

Convenience fees are different from surcharges. They are flat fees charged for using an alternative payment channel that isn’t the merchant’s standard payment method. A common example is an online payment fee when the normal method is in-person or mailed payment.

Convenience fees are legal in all 50 states, which makes them attractive. But they are not a workaround for normal in-person credit card transactions. If you try to call an in-person card fee a “convenience fee,” card brands will generally view it as a surcharge.

This model can work especially well for utilities, municipalities, schools, and businesses that collect payments by phone or through a separate online portal. For merchants comparing models, IntelliPay also has a guide on convenience fees vs. dual pricing.

Option 3: Dual Pricing

Dual pricing means displaying two prices: one for cash and one for card. Instead of adding a fee at checkout, you present the card price upfront and offer a lower cash price. That distinction matters, both legally and from a customer experience standpoint.

Dual pricing is legal in all 50 states and is often the simplest option for merchants who want broad flexibility without the extra registration and disclosure demands tied to traditional surcharging. It also tends to feel more consumer-friendly because customers see cash as receiving a discount rather than cards being penalized.

For many merchants, especially retail and service businesses, dual pricing offers the best balance of compliance simplicity, customer acceptance, and cost recovery. You can compare this option alongside others on IntelliPay’s payment models page.

Option 4: Service Fees

Service fees are a specialized option reserved mainly for qualifying government agencies and higher education institutions. These programs are designed for payments like taxes, court fees, tuition, and other eligible government or education transactions.

Unlike a standard surcharge, a service fee often runs as a separate transaction and follows a different compliance structure. This can create a near zero-cost processing model for the eligible entity, but it is not broadly available to general commercial merchants.

Choosing the Right Option

The best model depends on your business type, how customers pay you, and how much compliance complexity you’re willing to manage.

  • Retail businesses: Dual pricing is often the cleanest fit because it works nationwide and avoids most surcharge-specific compliance burdens.
  • Service businesses: Dual pricing usually works well, while convenience fees may fit if customers pay online or by phone for otherwise in-person services.
  • E-commerce businesses: Dual pricing is often easier to manage than state-by-state surcharge compliance. Convenience fees usually do not fit standard online checkout.
  • Government and education: Service fees may provide the strongest cost-recovery structure if your merchant category code qualifies.
  • High-volume merchants: Before adding any fee model, negotiate your processing rates first. Sometimes improving your pricing model produces meaningful savings without changing the customer experience at all.

Why This Matters More Now

Processing costs remain a major concern for merchants, and the regulatory environment keeps evolving. The FTC’s Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees took effect May 12, 2025, but it applies directly only to live-event ticketing and short-term lodging. Even so, it reflects a broader enforcement trend toward total-price transparency and clear fee disclosure.

That matters even for businesses outside the rule’s direct scope. If you’re going to pass processing costs to customers, it’s smarter than ever to be upfront, easy to understand, and consistent across your pricing, signage, receipts, and checkout flow.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I surcharge debit cards?

No. Debit and prepaid cards cannot be surcharged, even if they are processed as credit. That remains one of the clearest bright-line rules in this area.

What’s the difference between a surcharge and a convenience fee?

A surcharge is a percentage-based fee added because the customer used a credit card. A convenience fee is typically a flat fee tied to using an alternative payment channel, such as online or phone payment, rather than the standard method.

Is dual pricing the same as cash discounting?

In practice, yes. They describe the same general concept: card users pay one displayed price, while cash users receive a lower price or discount.

Is dual pricing legal in all 50 states?

Yes, when structured correctly. That nationwide legality is one reason so many merchants prefer it over traditional surcharging.

What’s the best option for most small businesses?

For many small businesses, dual pricing offers the strongest mix of legal simplicity, customer acceptance, and predictable cost recovery. But the best answer still depends on your industry, state, and payment flow.

What happened with the FTC junk fee rule?

The FTC rule took effect in May 2025 and directly applies to live-event ticketing and short-term lodging. It does not directly regulate most surcharge programs, but it reinforces the importance of displaying total prices clearly and avoiding surprise fees.

What should Illinois merchants do now?

If you operate in Illinois, review the Interchange Fee Prohibition Act with both your processor and legal counsel. The biggest operational issue is how tax and gratuity amounts are identified so interchange is not applied where the law restricts it.

The Bottom Line

Yes, it is legal to pass on credit card fees to customers in most parts of the U.S. But the legal path you choose matters. Surcharging offers the most direct recovery and the most compliance risk. Convenience fees are broadly legal but narrowly defined. Dual pricing is often the simplest and most flexible option. Service fees can be powerful, but only for qualifying entities.

Whatever route you choose, the best implementation is the one that is legally sound, clearly disclosed, easy for customers to understand, and aligned with how your business actually gets paid.

Need help choosing the right fee model?

Explore IntelliPay’s payment model options, compare convenience fees vs. dual pricing, or review our guide to B2B surcharging.

Compare payment models
author avatar
Dale Erling
Dale Erling is a veteran fintech leader with over 15 years of experience in banking and payment processing. Specializing in PCI compliance and interchange cost reduction, Dale helps organizations navigate complex financial landscapes with transparency and security. He is a recognized voice in utility fee architecture and a former strategist for Prosper Healthcare Lending.